Insights Home Insights Featured Content Report WIT ITC Report: Administrative Law Judge Doris Johnson Hines Our latest ITC ALJ report provides a comprehensive analysis of Administrative Law Judge Doris Johnson Hines’s activity at the International Trade Commission. Learn more about our findings. Case Study- Technology Case Study: Engineering Experts Needed for Automotive Antitrust Dispute In a complex antitrust dispute, the plaintiffs alleged that several automotive manufacturers engaged in agreements affecting vehicle design, technology development, and supplier selection. WIT provided three highly qualified experts, each offering distinct technical expertise to address the core issues in the case. Q&As Inside the First ITC 100-Day Review: Lessons Learned and Strategic Insights The ITC’s 100-day review procedure is a powerful tool that can reshape strategy before an investigation even begins. For companies, the challenge is clear: how do you prepare for a proceeding designed to decide case-dispositive issues on a compressed timeline? Report Biologics Litigation: Administrative Judges, Key Players, and Patent Patterns at the PTAB Of the 192 PTAB proceedings involving biologics, a small group of administrative patent judges has overseen a significant share of activity, while a handful of companies—on both the innovator and biosimilar sides—appear repeatedly across the docket. Let’s take a look at the data to see who the most active players in the space are. Press Release Jonathan Sachs Joins DOAR as Chief Revenue Officer Seasoned Legal Industry Executive to Drive Strategic Growth and Expand Market Reach for Premier Trial Consulting Company Insights & News All Focus Areas Automotive Cryptocurrency Financial Technology Former FDA Gaming Hatch-Waxman Litigation Healthcare Technology & Medical Devices ITC Investigations Pharmaceutical Wireless Communications All Insight Types Archive Article Blog Case Study Case Study- Life Sciences Case Study- Technology Event In the News Other Content Press Release Q&As Report Video Search April 11, 2025 — Q&As Expert Witness Anxiety and Authenticity: A Q&A with DOAR Trial Consultant Dr. Roy Futterman How can expert witnesses connect with skeptical jurors? We asked a seasoned trial consultant from DOAR to provide strategies to help experts build credibility, manage stress, and deliver compelling testimony at trial. February 18, 2025 — Q&As Rethinking Experience: Why New Expert Witnesses Deserve a Closer Look To explore the value of emerging testifying experts, we spoke with several members of the WIT team to gain insights on addressing client concerns, shifting perceptions, and how strategic preparation can turn fresh talent into indispensable litigation assets. February 3, 2025 — Press Release WIT Legal Releases 2nd Annual Report on Trends in Hatch-Waxman Litigation The new report examines Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) cases and the Orange Book-listed products at issue throughout 2024. January 31, 2025 — Report 2024 in Review: Analyzing Hatch-Waxman Litigation Trends Our latest Hatch-Waxman report, 2024 in Review: Analyzing Hatch-Waxman Litigation Trends, provides a comprehensive look at 2024’s activities and trends in ANDA litigation. January 13, 2025 — Q&As A Conversation with WIT’s Hatch-Waxman Practice Chair: Examining 2024 ANDA Litigation Activity Recently, we spoke to our Hatch-Waxman Practice Chair, Michael Crowe, to gain insights into Hatch-Waxman litigation trends in 2024. Here’s what he had to say about filings and possible trends in the year ahead. December 18, 2024 — Report WIT Hatch-Waxman Report: Judge Michael Shipp Our latest Hatch-Waxman report provides a comprehensive analysis of Judge Michael Shipp's activity at the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey since his appointment in July 2012. Learn more about our findings. December 12, 2024 — Blog Expert Qualifications Under Revised FRE 702: A Look at Recent Cases The 2023 amendment to Federal Rule of Evidence (FRE) 702 has introduced stricter standards for expert testimony, challenging litigators to adapt to the evolving requirements. Let’s take a look at five recent cases to see how courts are putting these requirements into practice—insights that will prove particularly valuable for litigators planning their expert strategy. November 6, 2024 — Blog Perspectives on the Amendment to Rule 702 To better understand how the amendment is reshaping the way expert testimony is being handled, we contacted key stakeholders for their insights. From the perspectives of an attorney, expert liaison, and expert witness, these changes are prompting more thorough vetting and strategic planning in selecting experts for matters. October 25, 2024 — Q&As Q&A: The Impact of Changes to Federal Rule of Evidence 702 We asked WIT CEO Paul Neale to share his thoughts on the implications of the FRE 702 amendment and the proactive measures attorneys can take to ensure their expert witnesses withstand greater judicial scrutiny. October 23, 2024 — Blog Life Sciences Roundup: Top Insights from Q2 – Q3 Life sciences companies face mounting litigation over patents, products, and pricing practices. Successfully navigating these matters requires expertise from qualified experts and an expert agency focused on arising litigation trends. Check out our insights. Load More Loading...
Report WIT ITC Report: Administrative Law Judge Doris Johnson Hines Our latest ITC ALJ report provides a comprehensive analysis of Administrative Law Judge Doris Johnson Hines’s activity at the International Trade Commission. Learn more about our findings.
Case Study- Technology Case Study: Engineering Experts Needed for Automotive Antitrust Dispute In a complex antitrust dispute, the plaintiffs alleged that several automotive manufacturers engaged in agreements affecting vehicle design, technology development, and supplier selection. WIT provided three highly qualified experts, each offering distinct technical expertise to address the core issues in the case.
Q&As Inside the First ITC 100-Day Review: Lessons Learned and Strategic Insights The ITC’s 100-day review procedure is a powerful tool that can reshape strategy before an investigation even begins. For companies, the challenge is clear: how do you prepare for a proceeding designed to decide case-dispositive issues on a compressed timeline?
Report Biologics Litigation: Administrative Judges, Key Players, and Patent Patterns at the PTAB Of the 192 PTAB proceedings involving biologics, a small group of administrative patent judges has overseen a significant share of activity, while a handful of companies—on both the innovator and biosimilar sides—appear repeatedly across the docket. Let’s take a look at the data to see who the most active players in the space are.
Press Release Jonathan Sachs Joins DOAR as Chief Revenue Officer Seasoned Legal Industry Executive to Drive Strategic Growth and Expand Market Reach for Premier Trial Consulting Company
April 11, 2025 — Q&As Expert Witness Anxiety and Authenticity: A Q&A with DOAR Trial Consultant Dr. Roy Futterman How can expert witnesses connect with skeptical jurors? We asked a seasoned trial consultant from DOAR to provide strategies to help experts build credibility, manage stress, and deliver compelling testimony at trial.
February 18, 2025 — Q&As Rethinking Experience: Why New Expert Witnesses Deserve a Closer Look To explore the value of emerging testifying experts, we spoke with several members of the WIT team to gain insights on addressing client concerns, shifting perceptions, and how strategic preparation can turn fresh talent into indispensable litigation assets.
February 3, 2025 — Press Release WIT Legal Releases 2nd Annual Report on Trends in Hatch-Waxman Litigation The new report examines Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) cases and the Orange Book-listed products at issue throughout 2024.
January 31, 2025 — Report 2024 in Review: Analyzing Hatch-Waxman Litigation Trends Our latest Hatch-Waxman report, 2024 in Review: Analyzing Hatch-Waxman Litigation Trends, provides a comprehensive look at 2024’s activities and trends in ANDA litigation.
January 13, 2025 — Q&As A Conversation with WIT’s Hatch-Waxman Practice Chair: Examining 2024 ANDA Litigation Activity Recently, we spoke to our Hatch-Waxman Practice Chair, Michael Crowe, to gain insights into Hatch-Waxman litigation trends in 2024. Here’s what he had to say about filings and possible trends in the year ahead.
December 18, 2024 — Report WIT Hatch-Waxman Report: Judge Michael Shipp Our latest Hatch-Waxman report provides a comprehensive analysis of Judge Michael Shipp's activity at the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey since his appointment in July 2012. Learn more about our findings.
December 12, 2024 — Blog Expert Qualifications Under Revised FRE 702: A Look at Recent Cases The 2023 amendment to Federal Rule of Evidence (FRE) 702 has introduced stricter standards for expert testimony, challenging litigators to adapt to the evolving requirements. Let’s take a look at five recent cases to see how courts are putting these requirements into practice—insights that will prove particularly valuable for litigators planning their expert strategy.
November 6, 2024 — Blog Perspectives on the Amendment to Rule 702 To better understand how the amendment is reshaping the way expert testimony is being handled, we contacted key stakeholders for their insights. From the perspectives of an attorney, expert liaison, and expert witness, these changes are prompting more thorough vetting and strategic planning in selecting experts for matters.
October 25, 2024 — Q&As Q&A: The Impact of Changes to Federal Rule of Evidence 702 We asked WIT CEO Paul Neale to share his thoughts on the implications of the FRE 702 amendment and the proactive measures attorneys can take to ensure their expert witnesses withstand greater judicial scrutiny.
October 23, 2024 — Blog Life Sciences Roundup: Top Insights from Q2 – Q3 Life sciences companies face mounting litigation over patents, products, and pricing practices. Successfully navigating these matters requires expertise from qualified experts and an expert agency focused on arising litigation trends. Check out our insights.
