Insights Home Insights Featured Content Report Biologics Litigation: Administrative Judges, Key Players, and Patent Patterns at the PTAB Of the 192 PTAB proceedings involving biologics, a small group of administrative patent judges has overseen a significant share of activity, while a handful of companies—on both the innovator and biosimilar sides—appear repeatedly across the docket. Let’s take a look at the data to see who the most active players in the space are. Q&As A Conversation with WIT’s ITC Chair: Key Insights on Administrative Law Judges in Section 337 Investigations We recently spoke with our ITC Practice Chair, Jeffrey Dorfman, a seasoned New York attorney, to explore how ALJ-specific practices are influencing the course of investigations. Let's take a look at what he had to say about their behavior and investigation approach. Press Release Jonathan Sachs Joins DOAR as Chief Revenue Officer Seasoned Legal Industry Executive to Drive Strategic Growth and Expand Market Reach for Premier Trial Consulting Company Case Study- Technology Case Study: UAV Expert Needed for Patent Dispute Involving System Configuration and Design A developer of drone technology alleged that a competing company infringed on their patents related to internal system architecture and product design. WIT provided a UAV expert with extensive aerospace engineering experience to evaluate both the technical and visual claims. Blog Biologics Litigation at the PTAB: Key Ingredients, Therapies, and Patents Driving Disputes WIT analyzed 192 PTAB proceedings involving biologics to uncover which products, technologies, and therapeutic areas are most frequently challenged, and what this activity reveals about where the market is headed. Insights & News All Focus Areas Automotive Cryptocurrency Financial Technology Former FDA Gaming Hatch-Waxman Litigation Healthcare Technology & Medical Devices ITC Investigations Pharmaceutical Wireless Communications All Insight Types Archive Article Blog Case Study Case Study- Life Sciences Case Study- Technology Event In the News Other Content Press Release Q&As Report Video Search May 20, 2025 — Case Study- Technology Case Study: Supply Chain Expert Needed for Semiconductor Patent Dispute In a semiconductor patent dispute involving power management chips, the defendant was accused of using patented technology. The dispute raised questions about chip design and the movement of products through the global electronics supply chain into the U.S. market. April 11, 2025 — Q&As Expert Witness Anxiety and Authenticity: A Q&A with DOAR Trial Consultant Dr. Roy Futterman How can expert witnesses connect with skeptical jurors? We asked a seasoned trial consultant from DOAR to provide strategies to help experts build credibility, manage stress, and deliver compelling testimony at trial. March 17, 2025 — Case Study- Technology Case Study: Wireless Communications Expert Needed for PTAB Proceedings A technology company petitioned for IPR proceedings to challenge the validity of two wireless communications patents, arguing that the patented methods were already established industry practices. March 4, 2025 — Report 2024 in Review: Key ITC Insights Report WIT's second annual ITC report, 2024 in Review: Key ITC Insights, provides a comprehensive look at 2024's activities and trends at the ITC. Learn more about our findings. March 4, 2025 — Press Release New WIT Legal Report Details Key ITC Trends, Including a Resurgence in Patent Disputes and Case Filings The report provides an in-depth analysis of the U.S. International Trade Commission's (ITC) Section 337 Investigations over the past year, highlighting significant developments and investigation patterns at the venue. February 18, 2025 — Q&As Rethinking Experience: Why New Expert Witnesses Deserve a Closer Look To explore the value of emerging testifying experts, we spoke with several members of the WIT team to gain insights on addressing client concerns, shifting perceptions, and how strategic preparation can turn fresh talent into indispensable litigation assets. December 12, 2024 — Blog Expert Qualifications Under Revised FRE 702: A Look at Recent Cases The 2023 amendment to Federal Rule of Evidence (FRE) 702 has introduced stricter standards for expert testimony, challenging litigators to adapt to the evolving requirements. Let’s take a look at five recent cases to see how courts are putting these requirements into practice—insights that will prove particularly valuable for litigators planning their expert strategy. November 13, 2024 — Case Study- Technology Case Study: Telecommunications Industry Expert Needed for International Regulatory Dispute A telecommunications provider sued a competitor for allegedly bypassing its international call fees through VoIP technology. The defendant countered with claims of regulatory and antitrust violations, leading them to engage with WIT for a telecommunications expert to address the complex economic and competitive issues at stake. November 6, 2024 — Blog Perspectives on the Amendment to Rule 702 To better understand how the amendment is reshaping the way expert testimony is being handled, we contacted key stakeholders for their insights. From the perspectives of an attorney, expert liaison, and expert witness, these changes are prompting more thorough vetting and strategic planning in selecting experts for matters. October 30, 2024 — Blog Technology Roundup: Top Insights from Q2 – Q3 The rapid pace of innovation has resulted in increasingly complex disputes within the technology sector. Successfully navigating these disputes requires expertise from qualified experts and an expert agency focused on emerging technology trends. Check out our insights. Load More Loading...
Report Biologics Litigation: Administrative Judges, Key Players, and Patent Patterns at the PTAB Of the 192 PTAB proceedings involving biologics, a small group of administrative patent judges has overseen a significant share of activity, while a handful of companies—on both the innovator and biosimilar sides—appear repeatedly across the docket. Let’s take a look at the data to see who the most active players in the space are.
Q&As A Conversation with WIT’s ITC Chair: Key Insights on Administrative Law Judges in Section 337 Investigations We recently spoke with our ITC Practice Chair, Jeffrey Dorfman, a seasoned New York attorney, to explore how ALJ-specific practices are influencing the course of investigations. Let's take a look at what he had to say about their behavior and investigation approach.
Press Release Jonathan Sachs Joins DOAR as Chief Revenue Officer Seasoned Legal Industry Executive to Drive Strategic Growth and Expand Market Reach for Premier Trial Consulting Company
Case Study- Technology Case Study: UAV Expert Needed for Patent Dispute Involving System Configuration and Design A developer of drone technology alleged that a competing company infringed on their patents related to internal system architecture and product design. WIT provided a UAV expert with extensive aerospace engineering experience to evaluate both the technical and visual claims.
Blog Biologics Litigation at the PTAB: Key Ingredients, Therapies, and Patents Driving Disputes WIT analyzed 192 PTAB proceedings involving biologics to uncover which products, technologies, and therapeutic areas are most frequently challenged, and what this activity reveals about where the market is headed.
May 20, 2025 — Case Study- Technology Case Study: Supply Chain Expert Needed for Semiconductor Patent Dispute In a semiconductor patent dispute involving power management chips, the defendant was accused of using patented technology. The dispute raised questions about chip design and the movement of products through the global electronics supply chain into the U.S. market.
April 11, 2025 — Q&As Expert Witness Anxiety and Authenticity: A Q&A with DOAR Trial Consultant Dr. Roy Futterman How can expert witnesses connect with skeptical jurors? We asked a seasoned trial consultant from DOAR to provide strategies to help experts build credibility, manage stress, and deliver compelling testimony at trial.
March 17, 2025 — Case Study- Technology Case Study: Wireless Communications Expert Needed for PTAB Proceedings A technology company petitioned for IPR proceedings to challenge the validity of two wireless communications patents, arguing that the patented methods were already established industry practices.
March 4, 2025 — Report 2024 in Review: Key ITC Insights Report WIT's second annual ITC report, 2024 in Review: Key ITC Insights, provides a comprehensive look at 2024's activities and trends at the ITC. Learn more about our findings.
March 4, 2025 — Press Release New WIT Legal Report Details Key ITC Trends, Including a Resurgence in Patent Disputes and Case Filings The report provides an in-depth analysis of the U.S. International Trade Commission's (ITC) Section 337 Investigations over the past year, highlighting significant developments and investigation patterns at the venue.
February 18, 2025 — Q&As Rethinking Experience: Why New Expert Witnesses Deserve a Closer Look To explore the value of emerging testifying experts, we spoke with several members of the WIT team to gain insights on addressing client concerns, shifting perceptions, and how strategic preparation can turn fresh talent into indispensable litigation assets.
December 12, 2024 — Blog Expert Qualifications Under Revised FRE 702: A Look at Recent Cases The 2023 amendment to Federal Rule of Evidence (FRE) 702 has introduced stricter standards for expert testimony, challenging litigators to adapt to the evolving requirements. Let’s take a look at five recent cases to see how courts are putting these requirements into practice—insights that will prove particularly valuable for litigators planning their expert strategy.
November 13, 2024 — Case Study- Technology Case Study: Telecommunications Industry Expert Needed for International Regulatory Dispute A telecommunications provider sued a competitor for allegedly bypassing its international call fees through VoIP technology. The defendant countered with claims of regulatory and antitrust violations, leading them to engage with WIT for a telecommunications expert to address the complex economic and competitive issues at stake.
November 6, 2024 — Blog Perspectives on the Amendment to Rule 702 To better understand how the amendment is reshaping the way expert testimony is being handled, we contacted key stakeholders for their insights. From the perspectives of an attorney, expert liaison, and expert witness, these changes are prompting more thorough vetting and strategic planning in selecting experts for matters.
October 30, 2024 — Blog Technology Roundup: Top Insights from Q2 – Q3 The rapid pace of innovation has resulted in increasingly complex disputes within the technology sector. Successfully navigating these disputes requires expertise from qualified experts and an expert agency focused on emerging technology trends. Check out our insights.
